The loud America is easy to find. Presidents, billionaires, cable television, aircraft carriers, Trump, Infantino presenting yet another oversized trophy beneath exploding fireworks. It is an America of noise, certainty and permanent performance.
There is another one. One that flaoted several thousand miles to take shape.
The arguments that tore England apart between 1642 and 1651 did not disappear with the execution of Charles I, nor with Oliver Cromwell’s Commonwealth, nor even with the Restoration of the monarchy in 1660. They crossed the Atlantic inside the people who had lived through them. They carried with them unresolved questions. Who should govern? Could conscience stand above authority? Could ordinary people make political decisions for themselves? Could faith exist without compulsion? England attempted to settle those arguments. Many remained unconvinced.
Among them were the Quakers.
Eccentric, uncompromising, deeply devout and frequently irritating, they refused to remove their hats before social superiors, refused to swear oaths, insisted that every human being possessed an Inner Light and believed that no king, bishop or priest stood between the individual conscience and God. For those convictions they were fined, imprisoned, beaten and mocked. Many stayed in England. Others boarded merchant ships in the 1680s bound for a continent they had never seen, hoping not simply to escape persecution but to continue an experiment.
They would have watched England disappear into mist, wondering whether they would ever see it again. Ahead lay forests, rivers, unfamiliar winters and hard physical labour. Nobody could promise that the experiment would succeed. The sea itself was part of the test, stripping away certainty long before they sighted land.
In 1681 William Penn received the charter for Pennsylvania. The following year he crossed the ocean himself, calling the colony his “Holy Experiment”: an attempt to build a society governed less by force than by conscience, with freedom of worship and laws made with the consent of those who lived under them. He insisted on negotiating with the Lenape people for land rather than simply claiming it by conquest, an extraordinary idea in an age when European empires generally assumed possession was enough.
It was never perfect.
Some Quakers owned enslaved people. Penn himself remained a man of the seventeenth century. Later generations broke promises made to Native Americans. The experiment was compromised, argued over and sometimes betrayed. Yet it also possessed an unusual capacity for self-criticism. During the eighteenth century Quakers increasingly rejected slavery from within their own communities. Figures such as John Woolman and Anthony Benezet helped make Pennsylvania one of the intellectual centres of the abolitionist movement, and later many Friends became active in the Underground Railroad.
This America rarely appears in political speeches, although Nixon, the least likely of Friends, tried.
It built meeting houses rather than monuments.
It distrusted uniforms.
It believed silence could sometimes reveal more than shouting.
It argued that peace was not weakness but discipline.
The English Civil War continued there, not with muskets and cavalry charges, but in quieter forms. Every meeting held without bishops, every refusal to bear arms, every insistence that conscience outweighed authority carried one thread of that unfinished argument into a new continent.
That tradition never became the whole of America. It was always one current among many, often overwhelmed by louder voices. Yet it never disappeared either.
Perhaps countries, like people, contain parallel selves. One reaches instinctively for power. Another asks whether power is the right question.
The quieter America still exists. You can find it in old brick meeting houses in Philadelphia, in schools, relief organisations, peace movements and communities that continue to believe another way of living together is possible.
Leave a Reply