“I stopped drinking,” he says too quickly, and hears the weakness in it at once.
Lacan doesn’t even bother to smile. “No. You paused. A pause preserves the route. It is the loop catching its breath.”
“I was drinking too much,” says the Man. “Too often. It was…”
“Useful?” Lacan cuts in.
The Man starts again, and because he knows he is being watched, he becomes solemn. “This is dead serious,” he says.
The Editor, from somewhere just off-scene, asks for the shot to be retaken. There is too much static on the lens. The Man ignores him.
“It never begins as collapse,” he says. “It begins as relief.”
That is the first lie and the first truth. The first drink lands too well, too quickly, spreading through the body with that precise familiar efficiency, dissolving edges.
“You’re better like this,” a bar woman says. Or at least he thinks she would.
And of course he believes it. He has always believed it. Not the slurry fool. Not the permanent fuzz of hangovers. The useful version comes first. The brighter one. The socially solvent one.
“We’ve had enough,” the Boy says quietly.
“Never enough,” the Man replies.
She is not introduced. She is simply there, as some things are simply there in the loop: a cigarette lit, a glass in front of her, a half-amused expression that is neither concern nor curiosity but something colder and more exact – recognition without pity. Kristeva.
The Bulgarian exhales and gestures at the glass.
“You think this is pleasure,” she says. “It is not pleasure. It is proximity.”
“To what?” asks the Boy.
She smiles, but not at him. “To what you have already decided not to be.”
The Man laughs too quickly. “That’s a bit—”
“Accurate?” she says. “Yes. Addiction is not the collapse of the system but its horrible success. The machine does exactly what it was built to do. It gets you back to the same place while allowing you, briefly, to imagine movement.”
Across the bar, a shadow, Jerzy Pilch perhaps, raises a glass.
“Sobriety,” Julia says, “has never simply meant not drinking. It means no longer being allowed to feel complicated when in fact one is merely frightened. It means having to hear the body directly. I am tired. I am lonely. I am ashamed. I am angry. I want. I do not want.”
The Man pours another.
“This,” Julia says, “is the abject.”
He looks at her, irritated. “Abject, schmabject, object, schmobject. I’m not vomiting.”
“Not yet,” she says. “The abject is not the expulsion. It is the moment before. When the boundary fails but has not yet been repaired. When you are no longer quite yourself, but not yet something else. When you feel it, and continue.”
The Boy recoils slightly because he knows this feeling exactly, long before theory arrives to name it. The moment where the body begins to protest and the protest itself becomes part of the sequence. The point at which the warning becomes permission.
The old liturgy: just one more, because you have already started; just one more, because not to would make the whole thing ridiculous; just one more, because the evening has not yet become itself.
“To not stopping,” says the Man, raising the glass.
“Exactly,” Julia replies.
Across the city, grotesques in bars and kitchens and conference hotels conduct the same chemistry in their own dialects. Diplomats become charming. Journalists become incisive. Minor men become profound. Peacocks become philosophers.
The whole republic of vanity glistens for an hour or two.
“It works,” says the Man.
“Of course it works,” says Lacan. “That is why you use it.”
“But it stopped working,” says the Boy.
Lacan shakes his head. “No. Worse. It continued to work exactly as before.”
The body, as it does, then steps in.
There is heat. Low, insistent, unignorable. Then pain, obscene in its specificity, humiliating precisely because it refuses grandeur. The Man tries, briefly, to ignore it, to fold it back into the sequence, to continue as if the body were merely another register to be managed. It cannot be managed. There is a toilet. Blood. Panic. The grotesque reduction of the whole metaphysical drama to one man doubled over in a cubicle brought finally to his knees not by heartbreak, or jealousy, or the collapse of a marriage, but by his own arse.
The Boy, despite himself, laughs.
The Editor is appalled. He begins instinctively to soften the description, to adjust tone, to render it somehow more literary, more proportionate to the rest of the crisis.
Lacan stops him. “No. The Real does not require editing.”
Clinic. Nobody asks about M, or the father, or exile, or Poland.
A doctor points at a diagram and says that if this continues they may have to operate.
The sentence enters him with the force of something both obvious and entirely new. It is not revelatory. It does not illuminate his childhood, nor reorganise desire. It simply makes continuation less attractive than stopping.
Sobriety, when it comes, is not relief. It does not feel clean. It does not feel like freedom. Everything returns without mediation – pressure, grief, boredom, fear, desire, vanity, the old humiliations and old hopes, stripped now of atmosphere. M is still M. The marriage is still ending. The work is still uncertain. Poland is still Poland. The inbox remains empty.
Only now there is no anaesthetic between him and any of it.
The Boy recognises the landscape immediately. This is what the lake felt like before the stories began.
And then, because the loop learns, a second form appears. This is where philosophy enters, or rather the pseudo-philosophical vanity of the recovering man who believes that because he has named the structure he no longer inhabits it.
“Be careful what you wish for, son,” says Shankly, standing below the tunnel.
“Just keep it simple,” he says. “Let the body think for you.”
“Isn’t that an oxymoron,” the Editor says.
“You’re an oxymoron,” Shankly barks back.
Sobriety creeps stealthily into vanity. Not the old crude inflation, not swagger or obvious self-deception, but something subtler, more plausible, and therefore more dangerous: confidence.
The loop no longer appears as compulsion. It appears as the capacity to hold the line, to remain composed where once he would have fallen apart.
“Alcohol, confidence, vanity, hope. Not separate substances but one solution. The recovering man clings to his new lucidity because it lets him believe he has transcended repetition.” Lacan is at Le Pop again.
“You do not escape the structure,” he says. “You merely become more elegant inside it.”
Shankly spits into the tunnel. “What’s he saying?”
“That he keeps hoping,” says the Boy.
“Aye,” says Shankly. “That’s simpler.”
And perhaps it is. The man does not only want relief. He wants the drink, the woman, the recovery, the confidence, the books, the body, the whole mangled apparatus.
But perhaps he always knew it was leading here: to the small, unheroic, difficult task of giving up certainty and living without anaesthetic.
For once what matters is not escape, not insight, not even control, but attention.
Nothing grander than that. Which is why it is so hard.
Leave a Reply